Ask ZiVA 728x90 Ads



National Assembly

There is no perfect constitution anywhere. The more advanced democracies in the world have had cause(s) to change and amend their constitutions over time.

Constitutions, whether written or not, are usually subjected to regular modifications or amendments in order to meet the exigencies of time and promote good governance. The United States of America has a written constitution which has had about 27 amendments since 1789 when it became operational.

The British Constitution, which is unwritten, has been undergoing amendments, though informally, from time to time through debates and conventions. That of Canada has gone through 11 amendments since it was transformed from an Act of the British Parliament to that of Canadian Parliament in 1982. Between 1789 and 1958, France had 15 different constitutions and from 1958 to date, about 24 amendments have been introduced into the Indian Constitution has had 105 amendments since it was made in 1950.

Nigeria is not an exception. In the course of our democratic experiment since political independence in 1960, we have had four republics.  We have had five  different constitutions: the Independence Constitution of 1960 and Republican Constitution of 1963, which were both  based on a parliamentary system of government.  The 1979 Constitution introduced the Presidential system of government in the Second Republic. Another Constitution  in 1993 was meant to guide the affairs of the aborted Third Republic. The current one was enacted for  the Fourth Republic in 1999 by the Abdusalami Abubakar military administration.

Many critics of this constitution believe it is not the People’s constitution because  it was neither debated by the people nor subjected to any referendum before it was approved by the then military government.

Fifth Alteration by the National Assembly

It is against this background that this writer welcomes efforts made by the Ninth National Assembly to amend it through the fifth alteration.

It was hoped that with this exercise, most of the issues currently agitating the minds of Nigerians would be addressed. But it appears that this is not the case.

The National Assembly deliberated on about 68 issues. No fewer than 44 issues were passed and transmitted to the 36 state assemblies for their deliberations and approval.

Issues passed by the National Assembly

Some of the notable bills passed by the National Assembly include: Bill on the separation of the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation from that of the Minister of Justice; Termination of tenure of elected officers after change of party; Financial autonomy for local government councils; Financial autonomy for states houses of Assembly and states judiciary; Independent candidacy and Free and compulsory basic education as a fundamental human right.

Bills rejected by the National Assembly

Bills rejected by the National Assembly include the bill to strengthen the judiciary for timely dispensation of justice; the bill on timeliness for the determination of civil and criminal cases; the bill on virtual/remote court proceedings; and bill on devolution of power.

Other bills rejected are qualification to become an indigene of a state; immunity for legislative and judicial officers; specific seats for women in National Assembly

35 per cent affirmative action for women in party administration; women to become indigenes of their husband’s states after five years of marriage; and citizenship to foreign-born husband of a Nigerian woman.

How lawmakers dashed our hopes

There is no doubt that the lawmakers made some efforts to improve on the provisions of the current constitution, but did these attempts go far enough? The answer is obviously no.

To most Nigerians, it is a matter of regret that the lawmakers dashed our hopes by not looking into most of the challenges facing the country today. They  include insecurity, resource control, corruption, poverty and unemployment.


The lawmakers forget that the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the people as spelt out in Section 14 (2b) of the 1999 Constitution ( as amended. According to the section, “the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.”

The lawmakers forgot that this aspect of the constitution has been largely ignored. They foret that we have all become captives to terrorists,  kidnappers and that one of the major causes of the persistence of this level of insecurity is because the major security forces ( the armed forces and the police ) for confronting these enemies are in the hands of the Federal Government .

They forget that state governors are not chief security officers as they are wrongly called. They are just lame – ducks chief security officers.

How do they expect us to tackle insecurity in a large federation like ours when all the security forces are under the control of the central government?

They forget that we will need to amend the constitution to create room for the creation of state and community police.

Resource Control

Our lawmakers did not also remember that another major cause of agitation in Nigeria today is that people do not have control over resources produced from their states or regions. This is due to the unitary nature of our federation. All the mineral resources in the country are owned by the Federal Government as stipulated in the Exclusive list of our constitution. Section 44(3) and Item 39 Schedule II of the Exclusive Legislative List of the constitution vests the control and management of mineral resources and hydrocarbon operations on the Federal Government for the common good and benefit of all citizens. This is not the situation in other federations. In a proper federal system of government, states are supposed to have access to the resources available in their areas.  In the US, for instance, states, even individuals, are allowed to own and produce mineral resources.

The current situation where the main source of survival in the country- crude oil  is the hands of the Federal Government, while the people from the oil producing states are living in squalor. Poverty and deprivation is not healthy for our polity.

Research has shown that there is no state in Nigeria that does not have the natural resources to survive on its own. But it is the dependence of states on monthly allocations from the Federal Government that has made them lazy, idle and poor. If states are made  to produce and spend only what they earn, the competition for survival will be to the overall benefit of all Nigerians.

This is in line with true federalism and restructuring.

Enforcement of socio-economic rights

Our lawmakers also forgot to understand that to promote social justice in the country,   we need to  urgently look into the amendment of the constitution to allow for the enforcement of socio-economic rights in Chapter II of the constitution.

Except for free and compulsory basic education, they did not address the issue of non-justiciability of socio-economic rights  provided in Section 6 (6c) of the constitution. This is an obstacle to the enforcement of socio-economic rights which are focused on the welfare of the people.

Difficult Challenges and their solutions

Are our lawmakers not aware of the fact that difficult and peculiar challenges require drastic solutions?  Are they not aware of the fact that the Academic Staff Union of  Universities (ASUU ) is currently on strike? Are they not in the know that this has become a permanent feature of our system?

Why not amend the Constitution to ensure a certain percentage of our budget is actually devoted to education?

Some people have even suggested that there should be a law to prohibit public officers, political appointees, their children and wards from schooling outside Nigeria. Can it be one of the ways to force the government to give attention to education and end the recurring strikes in our tertiary institutions?

The Way Forward

It is important  to note that most of the proposed amendments passed by the National Assembly to the state assemblies cannot bring about rapid political,  economic and social development of this country. They did not seriously address the issue of devolution of powers towards true federalism instead of the unitary system of government we are currently running. They did not tackle the   basic issues of insecurity, poverty, illiteracy and unemployment confronting the country. The way forward is for subsequent amendments to focus on these issues.

*** Mack Ogbamosa is a legal practitioner/communications consultant.